QuestionQuestion

Transcribed TextTranscribed Text

Introduction: If discrete time signal x/n] represents a sampled continuous-time signal, then we would like manner in which to produce from x[n] an output sequence y[n] that samples the derivative of the continuous- time signal. Believe not. this task is not trivial for many signals. In particular, most real signals are acquired in the presence of noise and sampled well above the Nyquist rate. An "ideal' discrete- time differentiator filter has frequency response of X(eiw) jw. Thus, (x(eia) -w, or the frequency response magnitude grows linearly with frequency. Thus, an ideal derivative will accentuate the high frequency information. However, many systems are sampled at or (well) above the Nyquist rate-thus the high frequency portion of the spectrum is dominated by noise. Hence, noise can dominate the output of a simple differentiator, such as first difference Thus,several techniques have been developed for taking the derivative of real signals Most cascade some approximation to the ideal frequency response with lowpass filter. The first stage differentiates the signal. but also accentuates the high-frequency noise. The second stage then attenuates the noise. es " As an example, consider the exponentially decaying sinusoid shown above left. Its analytic derivative is shown above right. In practice, most such signals are measured in the presence of some amount of noise. So, below left shows the signal with small amount of noise added (white Gaussian noise with a standard deviation of 0.01). Next below right shows derivative estimate of this noisy signal using the first -lof 5- backward difference method: where At is the sampling period. In this figure, the A/ magenta line is the true (analytic) derivative and the blue line is the estimate. Clearly, the estimated derivative is quite notsy - The figure below left shows the spectrum of the noise-free signal (magenta) and of the noise (blue). The signal- to-noise ratio is quite high at the low frequencies, but near value of 1 (0 dB) at high frequencies The poor performance of the first backward difference as derivative estimate seems to be associated with its high gain at high frequencies. One manner in which to resolve this issue is to cascade lowpass filter after the first difference. The figure below right shows the output of this cascade. using zero-phase lowpass filter whose cutoff frequency is 0.1 times the Nyquist frequency. Again, both the analytic derivative (magenta) and estimate (blue) are shown. In this case, an excellent derivative estimate results The Problem: Using this cascade of filters for derivative estimate, the optimal frequency location of the lowpass filter and the filter order depend on the character of the input signal x[n]. Hence, this project is formed bv studying methods of taking signal derivatives. One would likely start by selecting signal model (always include signal with some noise). Sinusoids are likely not the best selection for signal, as they only excite the system at one frequency location. Combinations of sines, sine wave chirp signals or other analytic forms might be more appropriate for testing. Using an analytic model of the input signal, its "truth" derivative can be determined analytically. Then, noise can be added to the signal, its derivative taken via DSP. and finally compared to truth derivative. This process can be repeated while systematically varying the filter cut-off frequency and the filter order of lowpass filter. -2of5- Some variations on this theme might include: Different techniques for mimicking an "ideal" derivative, including backward difference, forward difference and central difference, Lowpass filtering with FIR vs. IIR filters, Directly designing one filter that has a derivative characteristic at low frequencies, but lowpass characteristic thereafter, Time-domain curve fitting to produce the derivative: o To find the derivative at one time location, fit smooth curve (polynomial, spline, etc.) to several points in the neighborhood of the time location. Then, differentiate the smooth curve analytically and evaluate at the time location. This process gives an estimate of the derivative at that time. Now proceed to the next time and repeat etc. [See for example the discussion of Savitsky Golay filters described in the book "Numerical Recipes in C" (http://www. nrbook . Causal vs. n-causal (zero-phase) derivative estimates. In general, non-causal estimates tend to be better for derivative estimates. Your goal on this project is to select simulation signal model. with known derivative(s), and investigate the performance of various methods for estimating derivatives. Your methods need not be able to be implemented in real time, thus non-causal algorithms may be compared. As much as possible, you want to answer the question as to how YOU would estimate a derivative, given particular signal model Note that general solution likely depends on the signal model-s you should restrict your conclusions to the model(s) you study Primary MATI AB Code to Develop: 1) Write stand-alone MATLAB function for each signal simulation model that you develop. As minimum, the function should return the noise-free signal and the noise realization. Gaussian random noise is rather commonly selected noise (see MATLAB function randn) 2) Write stand-alone MATLA AB function for each derivative estimation technique that you study (e.g. first backward difference, first forward difference, central difference). Alternatively, you may write single function then include an input variable that selects between the techniques. 3) Write stand-alone MATLAB function for lowpass filtering of the signal after difference has been taken. Again, you may use input arguments to select the filter type (FIR, IIR and variations of them). filter order, cut-off location, etc. 4) Write any other functions that are needed to perform analysis of your derivative estimate, as explained below in Analysis. For example. you will be asked to evaluate the performance of each estimated derivative. One nice measure is the mean squared error between the true (analytic derivative) and your estimated derivative. When assessing this error, you most likely want to ignore those samples in the start-up transient(s) (head and, sometimes, tail) of your filters Analysis: For this project, the analysis will be described rather loosely Your overall goal is to investigate the performance of various methods for estimating derivatives. You want to recommend how someone might do so, based on the characteristics of their signal At minimum, implement at least two of the simple difference techniques (forward, backward, central) in cascade with lowpass filter. At minimum. investigate at least one FIR and one IIR style filter. So, there are four minimum combinations. For each. determine the performance of the technique as function of model order and lowpass filter cutoff frequency. If possible, present the performance of order -cutoff performance for each combination via 3D plot. Additional analysis, if desired, can investigate any of many possible variants, including: different signal models, different lowpass filter design methods, causal vs. phase non-causal processing, etc.

Solution PreviewSolution Preview

These solutions may offer step-by-step problem-solving explanations or good writing examples that include modern styles of formatting and construction of bibliographies out of text citations and references. Students may use these solutions for personal skill-building and practice. Unethical use is strictly forbidden.

%%
%Clearing the screen and workspace, closing all windows
clear;
clc;
close all;

%%
%Generating linear chirp signal. The chirp is sampled at 200 Hz for 5
%seconds. The instantaneous frequency is 0 at t = 0 and reaches 20 Hz
%at T = 5 second.
fs = 200;
T = 5;
f0 = 0;
f1 = 10;

%Function for creating the signal and its analytical derivative
%Input: fs-Sampling rate, T-Duration in seconds, f0-Starting
%frequency, f1-Final frequency
%Output: y-Signal, yder-Signal analytical derivative, t-time vector
[y, yder, t] = signal(fs, T, f0, f1);

%Plotting chirp signal
figure();
plot(t,y);
title('Chirp signal');
xlabel('Time (s)');
axis([0 T -2 2]);...

By purchasing this solution you'll be able to access the following files:
Solution.zip.

50% discount

Hours
Minutes
Seconds
$135.00 $67.50
for this solution

or FREE if you
register a new account!

PayPal, G Pay, ApplePay, Amazon Pay, and all major credit cards accepted.

Find A Tutor

View available MATLAB for Engineering Tutors

Get College Homework Help.

Are you sure you don't want to upload any files?

Fast tutor response requires as much info as possible.

Decision:
Upload a file
Continue without uploading

SUBMIT YOUR HOMEWORK
We couldn't find that subject.
Please select the best match from the list below.

We'll send you an email right away. If it's not in your inbox, check your spam folder.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Live Chats