The target suspects for the task force are slippery long-time organized crime figures.
They have routinely escaped successful prosecution through their nefarious defense attorneys.
To prepare new investigators assigned to the task force, you must caution them about mistakes that were made by previous task force members who were tripped up by the organized crime mouthpieces. Your task is to present legal issues that the defendants have used as loopholes in prior cases.
Acting as a special prosecutor for an organized crime task force,
Present a 3–5 page white paper on new members coming on board as investigators in the task force. The issues related in the bullets below will be incorporated into the paper presented.
There are a number of evidence-related resources that are not found in academic journals that may be utilized as references in this assignment.
It is critical that when you make a statement of fact in your presentation, that you cite the reference you obtained the information from in the text of the paper and that the reference is included in your reference page.
As always, your paper will be submitted in the APA format current edition.
No abstract is required because this is a short position paper, but a title page, reference page, and appropriate running header with page numbers are necessary.
Describe at least two grounds for impeachment of a witness in a criminal trial and the ramifications of the impeachment for the case.
Articulate the meaning of hearsay.
Explain how the Best Evidence Rule impacts hearsay prohibitions.
Explain at least two types of exceptions to the hearsay rule and why the court recognized their admissibility and truthfulness.
Detail at least two cautions about using privileged communications as evidence and the problems associated with doing so.
Compare and contrast the burdens of proof differences between a criminal and civil proceeding.
This material may consist of step-by-step explanations on how to solve a problem or examples of proper writing, including the use of citations, references, bibliographies, and formatting. This material is made available for the sole purpose of studying and learning - misuse is strictly forbidden.White Paper Addressed To New Members Joining The Task Force
The sole aim of having a case heard in court is so that disagreeing parties can reach a mutual agreement in accordance to the constitution.
This fact holds in both civil and criminal law. The defendants being the suspects are supposed to be proven beyond reasonable doubt that they are either guilty or innocent.
For the court to reach their verdict, there are various technicalities and protocols that are bound to be followed prior to this final decision being made.
These protocols are fair proceedings ought to be carried out in the courts. For a trial to be fair, certain rules of engagement should be taken into consideration.
These rules include the acquisition of credible witnesses and evidence produced before the court. The role of witnesses is to provide proof to the court that they have knowledge of the proceedings of a specific occurence. Witnesses are supposed to shed more light on the case so as to help the judge and the jury to reach a verdict.
However, not everything said by a witness holds water in the courts of justice.
Witnesses ought to provide evidence that proves beyond reasonable doubt that an inevitable occurrence happened.
The same case applies to evidence presented by the prosecution. Evidence submitted should be tamper-free, viable and relevant to the case being heard.
The following study...