The problem is that we're likely to have to be pretty lucky for p = p, so the real question is how likely it is that p is close to p. (This sort of thing is what statistics is all about: trying to infer from actual data what is really true and then estimate the likelihood that what is inferred is close to reality.)
Let us suppose, for the sake of argument, that we know that 0.5 ≤ p ≤ 0.6 (so 0.4 ≤ q= 1 - p ≤ 0.5) for our biased coin and that we have the time and patience to toss it any finite number of times n that we want. Further, let us suppose that we desire to get an estimate of p that is within 5% of the real value, i.e. 0.95p ≤ p ≤ l.05p.
1. How many times do we need to toss the coin, keeping track of the number of tosses and the number of success, to ensure that P(0.95p ≤ p ≤ 1.05p) ≥ 0.95? Please justify your answer as fully as you can.
NOTE: That is, what does n have to be to ensure that the probability that p is within 5% of p is at least 0.95?
This material may consist of step-by-step explanations on how to solve a problem or examples of proper writing, including the use of citations, references, bibliographies, and formatting. This material is made available for the sole purpose of studying and learning - misuse is strictly forbidden.