If you think they are consistent, provide a real or imagined example that illustrates this consistency. If you think they are inconsistent, provide a real or imagined example that illustrates this inconsistency.
Complete your post by discussing whether minimizing suffering is equal to, lesser than, or more important that generating the greatest good for the greatest number. Minimum 200 words.
These solutions may offer step-by-step problem-solving explanations or good writing examples that include modern styles of formatting and construction of bibliographies out of text citations and references. Students may use these solutions for personal skill-building and practice. Unethical use is strictly forbidden.There are two quotes I would like to use in support of the idea that the primary and secondary goals of utilitarianism are not necessarily inconsistent with each other. The first is Mill’s rather unobjectionable observation regarding human suffering: “…all the large sources of human suffering are to a large extent…conquerable by human care and effort...
By purchasing this solution you'll be able to access the following files: