Consider, if the primary goal of utilitarianism is to generate the greatest good for the greatest number, a secondary goal is to minimize suffering. Using at least one quote from one of the required readings, discuss the ways in which these two principles are consistent or inconsistent with each other.
If you think they are consistent, provide a real or imagined example that illustrates this consistency. If you think they are inconsistent, provide a real or imagined example that illustrates this inconsistency.
Complete your post by discussing whether minimizing suffering is equal to, lesser than, or more important that generating the greatest good for the greatest number. Minimum 200 words.
This material may consist of step-by-step explanations on how to solve a problem or examples of proper writing, including the use of citations, references, bibliographies, and formatting. This material is made available for the sole purpose of studying and learning - misuse is strictly forbidden.
There are two quotes I would like to use in support of the idea that the primary and secondary goals of utilitarianism are not necessarily inconsistent with each other. The first is Mill’s rather unobjectionable observation regarding human suffering: “…all the large sources of human suffering are to a large extent…conquerable by human care and effort...
This is only a preview of the solution. Please use the purchase button to see the entire solution