Question

Write a short reflection paper on one of the following topics.

In the Euthyphro selection, Plato presents an argument that poses a problem for the Divine Command Theory of morality.
Explain this argument and why it poses a problem for Divine Command Theory.
Then consider how this same argument might pose a problem for Hume's theory of morality.
What replies to the argument do you think are acceptable or does it pose a fatal problem for either Divine Command Theory or emotivism or both?

Solution Preview

This material may consist of step-by-step explanations on how to solve a problem or examples of proper writing, including the use of citations, references, bibliographies, and formatting. This material is made available for the sole purpose of studying and learning - misuse is strictly forbidden.

In ethics, a question can be raised. Who decides what is morally right? In other words, what grounds morals at all? On the one hand, one could say they do not steal because in their religious tradition the gods (or God) commands people not to steal. This is just one example. But what gives authority to this command? To support the view that what is moral is what the gods command, we can see the development of what has been called in the history of philosophy Divine Command Theory or (DCT).
In Plato’s Euthyphro, Divine Command Theory is the idea that God loves what is holy so we ought to act in holy ways because God commands it....

This is only a preview of the solution. Please use the purchase button to see the entire solution

$10.00

or $1 if you
register a new account!

Assisting Tutor

Related Homework Solutions

Study Guide on the Textbook: Doing Philosophy 5th Edition, Schrick and Vaughn
Homework Solution
$35.00
2.1 Cartesian Dualism: Ms <---> Nonphysical substance that interacts with the body. Body and mind and different substances. Conclusion: Descartes deductive arguments are valid but unsound. Empirically speaking there is no immaterial substance. Thus
Get help from a qualified tutor
Live Chats