By critically evaluating The Prince, do you agree with the political philosophy of Machiavelli?
Is his version of the social contract right or not right?
What do you agree / disagree with Machiavelli on?
This material may consist of step-by-step explanations on how to solve a problem or examples of proper writing, including the use of citations, references, bibliographies, and formatting. This material is made available for the sole purpose of studying and learning - misuse is strictly forbidden.
A Critical Evaluation of Fear and Protection in Machiavelli’s The Prince
In this critical essay I will write about the The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli, focusing on Chapter XVII, “Of Cruelty and Mercy, and Whether It Is Better to be Loved Than Feared, or the Contrary.” Machiavelli is know for his political philosophy, and the Prince, ostensibly a manual for young rulers of state, is a trenchant look at governance, its uses and abuses, and the ideology that surrounds state power. While on the surface the book is a manual, it offers a version of the social contract that says a society exists because the people live in fear and need the state to protect them. If fear is the driving force that keeps society together, then I want to critically evaluate the place fear has in Machiavelli’s argument, both to show if it is still relevant today, and if Machiavelli is right....
This is only a preview of the solution. Please use the purchase button to see the entire solution