On Plato's The Apology
Did you find Socrates' argument against the fear of death convincing?

Solution Preview

This material may consist of step-by-step explanations on how to solve a problem or examples of proper writing, including the use of citations, references, bibliographies, and formatting. This material is made available for the sole purpose of studying and learning - misuse is strictly forbidden.

Against the Fear of Death

Socrates’ argument against the fear of death was convincing. He argued that because it is unknown whether death is an evil or good thing, individuals should focus their energies on living righteously no matter the cost because if something is fated to occur then one cannot alter its course. In his examination of the nature of death, Socrates determined that it is either a state of nothingness and unconsciousness or a migration of the soul from this world to the next – both of which are determined to be equally desirable outcomes....

This is only a preview of the solution. Please use the purchase button to see the entire solution


or free if you
register a new account!

Related Homework Solutions

Study Guide on the Textbook: Doing Philosophy 5th Edition, Schrick and Vaughn
Homework Solution
2.1 Cartesian Dualism: Ms <---> Nonphysical substance that interacts with the body. Body and mind and different substances. Conclusion: Descartes deductive arguments are valid but unsound. Empirically speaking there is no immaterial substance. Thus
Get help from a qualified tutor
Live Chats