Subject Philosophy Philosophic Logic

Question

Analyze the validity of the following argument:

P1: Capital punishment entails the killing of a convicted criminal as punishment for a crime.
P2: Punishment for a crime is a circumstance.
P3: ‘Killing’ here refers to the deliberate termination of the life of a person.
P4: A convicted criminal is a person.
P5. Deliberate termination of the life of a person is impermissible under any circumstances.
P6. Thus, deliberate termination of the life of a convicted criminal is impermissible under any circumstances.
P7. Thus, killing a convicted criminal is impermissible under any circumstances.
C: Therefore, capital punishment is impermissible under any circumstances.

Solution Preview

This material may consist of step-by-step explanations on how to solve a problem or examples of proper writing, including the use of citations, references, bibliographies, and formatting. This material is made available for the sole purpose of studying and learning - misuse is strictly forbidden.

I think this argument is deductively valid. The primary reason for thinking so is that, with the exception of P4 and P5, the premises are either definitional or follow directly from previous premises – with the conclusion itself a sort of ‘premise’ following directly from the preceding premises...

This is only a preview of the solution. Please use the purchase button to see the entire solution

Assisting Tutor

Related Homework Solutions

Get help from a qualified tutor
Live Chats