# Atmospheric Dynamics 1. Consider a form of the QG vorticity equati...

## Transcribed Text

Atmospheric Dynamics 1. Consider a form of the QG vorticity equation, (1) with B2 III (3)+V.V) v3 the geostrophic velocity, 53 the vorticity associated with the geostrophic velocity, Vo = v - v2 the ageostrophic component of the velocity, and the beta- plane approximation f = ++By (a) Assuming purely geostrophic flow, consider how a small amplitude initial condition that is wavy in x and y will evolve: find the dispersion relation. (Hint: Linearize the equation, then introduce a streamfunction [or equivalently the geopotential] to write it in terms of a single quantity; note that geostrophic flow is nondivergent.) (b) Consider a small amplitude initial condition in eq. (1) that is wavy in the x direction only (uniform in the y and Z directions). Assume the flow is nearly geostrophic and is in a homogenous incompressible ocean basin (i.e., constant g) with zero background motion. Here variability in x has to lead to divergent (hence ageostrophic) flow and changes in depth (h), so you'll need the continuity equation in the shallow water approximation, as we used for surface gravity waves. Let u,v,h) = and linearize (here H is the constant depth of the unperturbed basin). Write the governing equation as a PDE in h and derive the dispersion relation. Compare with the answer to (la). What kind of wave is this? 2. Consider conservation of Ertel PV for nearly geostrophic flow. Consider small perturbations about the mean potential temperature, 0 = Bote', with 00/0p being constant, and show that the Ertel PV can be written as the sum of relative vorticity, planetary vorticity, and a stretching vorticity (note that constant factors scaling the Ertel PV are irrelevant and can be dropped, since the relevant feature of Ertel PV is that it is conserved). Compare your result with the QGPV equation, which we'll discuss in lecture: O. 9 III fo 1 / + a o , with 9 the QGPV. You should be able to readily show that the first two terms in your expression of the Ertel PV are identical to the first two terms in the QGPV. For the third term in your expression of the Ertel PV, it is sufficient to just argue that it represents the stretching of columns, even if you can't get it into a form identical to the third term in the QGPV. 3. Optional: Consider the shallow water QGPV equation derived in class on Tuesday, which is a single equation for H1. Linearize and insert a wavy ansatz, and show that it gives a dispersion relation that is similar to the free barotropic Rossby waves (which were for a fluid of constant beight) that we discussed in class except for an additional term involving H in the denomenator. 1

## Solution Preview

This material may consist of step-by-step explanations on how to solve a problem or examples of proper writing, including the use of citations, references, bibliographies, and formatting. This material is made available for the sole purpose of studying and learning - misuse is strictly forbidden.

By purchasing this solution you'll be able to access the following files:
Solution.pdf.

\$25.00
for this solution

or FREE if you
register a new account!

PayPal, G Pay, ApplePay, Amazon Pay, and all major credit cards accepted.

### Find A Tutor

View available Fluid Dynamics Tutors

Get College Homework Help.

Are you sure you don't want to upload any files?

Fast tutor response requires as much info as possible.