You are supervisee (it is somebody RBT who is supervised from BCBA) engaging in a Supervised Field Experience under the guidance of an experienced Board Certified Behavior Analyst, you work for a small lrural agency that provides behavioral support services to clients with a variety of diagnosis and disabilities. There is limited access to other behavior analytic services outside of your agency. Since you are nearing the end of your supervision experience, your BACB supervisor has asked you to work on a case for a 10-year-old boy named Frankie who has been diagnosed with Autism. He also has several food allergies (non-life threatening) and food selectivity issues, which contribute to a number of behavioral concerns. Frankie’s parents have requested behavioral treatment because he frequently attempts to steal food that he is allergic to and will become aggressive when he is not allowed to have it. In addition, he will regularly refuse to eat at mealtimes because the foods that his parents serve to him are non-preferred, often throwing his plate of food or running away from the table. In preparation for your next supervision meeting, your Supervisor has asked you to determine the steps needed to proceed with Frankie’s case, and to develop a plan of action to begin working with Frankie and his parents. Even though you have never worked on a case dealing specifically with problem eating behaviors, you are eager to learn and want to accumulate the knowledge as part of your supervision experience. You also learn that your supervisor has only worked on one other case like this a few years back and does not have very much experience, either.
Part One: Determine the Ethical Concerns
First, given that you have never worked on this kind of case before, discuss the specific ethical considerations with regards to the ethical codes and core principles that need to be addressed related to responsibility to the field, the supervision process, and your role as a supervisee.
Part Two: Establish a Plan of Action
Next, determine a plan of action for Frankie’s case, including how you would conduct a risk/benefit analysis, and specifically outline each of the key ethical considerations that will support the steps in the assessment and intervention processes. Be sure to use the BACB Professional and Ethical Compliance Code (2014) as a framework, and take careful thought in supporting your discussions with specific codes and relevant rationale. Also, include how certain core ethical principles discussed by Bailey & Burch (2016) (i.e do no harm, being just, etc) might be applied to each aspect of your response (12 pages).
Other Requirements
You should apply APA Style formatting throughout your paper. Include a title page, section headings, in-text citations, and a references page. Keep direct quotes to a minimum. You should also include an introductory paragraph, thesis sentence, and summary paragraph.
You should cite relevant empirical research and scholarly articles within Applied Behavior Analysis. You should cite a minimum of seven peer-reviewed journal articles and other academic sources for a total of at least 10 references. You should carefully select sources after reviewing the literature and evaluating the credibility, relevance, quality, and research merit of each source.
Steps to do it
Ethical concerns regarding the practitioners’ responsibilities to the field and the client, explains ethical codes and principles related to these responsibilities,
• Provides a clear and comprehensive rationale grounded in the Codes and Principles to support the statements.
• Identifie the actions that would limit or alleviate ethical concerns within the case and provides a reasonable resolution to the ethical problem.
Potential ethical concerns related to the supervision relationship and outlines the necessary ethical responsibilities that inform the supervision process, both from the supervisor and supervisee perspectives.
• Provide a clear and comprehensive rationale grounded in the Codes and Principles to support the statements.
• Identifies the actions that would limit or alleviate ethical concerns within the case and provides a reasonable resolution to the ethical problem.
Discusse the process for conducting a risk/benefit analysis and provides a clear rationale for developing an intervention in this case.
Explain the steps necessary to conduct assessment and implement intervention procedures, and provides a clear and comprehensive rationale grounded in the Codes and Principles to support the steps for assessment and intervention.
Writing Mechanics
Clear, concise introduction (ending in a solid thesis statement), complete paragraphs, and a final conclusion. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation following Standard American English guidelines; free of typographical errors. Provides a clear and logical order of presentation where ideas transition from one topic to the next reflecting a scholarly tone. Meets the minimum page length requirement, not including the title page or reference page.
These solutions may offer step-by-step problem-solving explanations or good writing examples that include modern styles of formatting and construction of bibliographies out of text citations and references.
Students may use these solutions for personal skill-building and practice.
Unethical use is strictly forbidden.
Ethical Concerns and Considerations in Frankie’s Case
Ethical Concerns Regarding the Practitioners
The first ethical consideration for behavior analyst as per the BACB code is reliance on scientific knowledge. Behavioral analysts have to rely on professionally and scientifically derived knowledge during decision making (BACB, 2014, Code 1.01). They have to use scientifically proven and tested procedures and techniques. Behavioral analysts also need to ensure that they offer intervention services in the areas where they are competent as dictated by their education, supervised experience, training, consultation, and professional experience (Bailey & Burch, 2016, p. 76). The essence of this consideration is to ensure that no harm occurs to the affected children or their families. This ethical consideration calls for behavioral analysis practitioners to invest in the development and maintenance of their competence through the continuous refinement of knowledge and skills acquired through education (Bailey & Burch, 2016, p. 77). Continuous improvements in skills and expertise prevent behavioral practitioners from misdiagnosing problems, which may cause harm to the client (BACB, 2014, Code 1.03). This principle strives to shield the client from harm by encouraging analyst to act in a truthful, honest and professional manner. In light of this consideration behavior analysis practitioners are expected to closely and diligently execute their ethical and professional obligations (Riordan, Iwata, Finney, Wohl, & Stanley, 1984, p. 328). As emphasized under the rights and prerogatives of clients the supervisee and his supervisor have the obligation to disclose their credentials to the client (BACB, 2014, Code 2.05).
Behavior analyst practitioners are supposed to discuss their services in a language that clients understand while still remaining professional (BACB, 2014, Code 1.05). Achieving this ensures the client receives appropriate information and before during and after the process. Professionalism would require that the practitioners discuss the results and the intervention with the client and their families. The practitioners are also expected to effectively navigate beyond barriers that may be imposed by differences in gender, race, religion culture, ethnicity age, and sexual orientation.
The client is Frankie a ten years old boy diagnosed with Autism. Frankie’s parents have requested the intervention of a behavioral analyst because Frankie has food selectivity issues and refuses to eat food that he does not prefer leading to several behavioral concerns. The medical problem involved is food allergy and the problem behavior includes stealing food he is allergic to, throwing his non preferred food, refusal to eat, running away and aggression. The RBT is tasked in implementing a treatment intervention that would assist in correcting the behavioral problem experienced with Frankie with the guidance of his supervisor. The supervisee and supervisor in Frankie’s case need to focus on their role as behavior analysts and stay away from any conduct that would encourage the development of multiple relationships (BACB, 2014, Code 1.07). The supervisee and supervisor in Frankie’s case are facing a complex set of challenges that are likely to affect their professionalism. For example, there might be a conflict between their views and those of Frankie’s parents regarding the best approach to be used. Behavior analysts are to avoid multiple relationships due to their potentially harmful effects. According to the BACB (2014, Code 2.04), multiple relationships describe any situation whereby an analysis takes more than one role with a client. At times multiple relationships may occur due to unforeseen situations but regardless of the cause, multiple relationships are to resolve such that the analyst retains the primary role of being a behavior analyst (BACB, 2014, Code 1.06). An important issue is behavior analysts rejecting any form of gifts and presents from clients or their families for this constitutes multiple relationships.
This is only a preview of the solution.
Please use the purchase button to see the entire solution.