Your active participation in the weekly Discussions is important to the shared learning experience. Active Discussions will also develop your community of professionals. Please participate as early in the week as possible, and be sure to share your thoughts and ideas as often as you can throughout the unit.
Your original response should be at least 350 words and should reflect the fact that you have completed the assigned readings for the week. Remember, this is your chance to illustrate not only your understanding, but also your mastery of the materials for the unit. Use your words wisely so the posting has substance and includes examples and explanations. Limit the use of direct quotes, and do your best to critically synthesize and evaluate the literature in your own words wherever possible. Make sure to include in-text citations and a reference list as appropriate.
Using the recommendations on pp. 603–604 in the Cooper text as a guide, provide an example of how you could use self-administered consequence to increase a desired behavior. Using these same recommendations, provide an additional example of how you could use self-administered consequences to decrease an undesired behavior. Are there any drawbacks to the use of self-administered consequences? Any ethical, legal, practical, individual and/or social validity concerns?
These solutions may offer step-by-step problem-solving explanations or good writing examples that include modern styles of formatting and construction of bibliographies out of text citations and references. Students may use these solutions for personal skill-building and practice. Unethical use is strictly forbidden.To increase the desired behavior, the self-administered consequence could prove productive. Nevertheless, what matters the most are the steps followed to implement the model. The key to promoting abstinence from drug use is to implement a concurrent schedule arrangement where one response produces drug reinforcement and another that produces a non-drug reinforcer (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007). Hence, if a student exhibits appropriate classroom standards such raising their hands silently rather than calling out the teacher loud, the instructor might concurrently reward the scholar through consistent recognition of the behavior as a benchmark tendency and scold the learner whenever he or she fail to exhibit the conduct....
By purchasing this solution you'll be able to access the following files: