Explain the sovereign paradox sources
Use standard formatting:
• 12 point font (Times New Roman)
• 1 inch margins
• No more than 1 inch of space dedicated to title and header
• Answer must be in 7 pages
• Do NOT cite outside sources.
• Use Class lecture notes to cite.
• For example:
Concluding the Surrender (Sovereign) Paradox. It's a paradox because it involves the transfer of present power in the expectation of future benefits. This opens up several problems, one, a credible commitment, and as we will see, this needs to be addressed, and also the problem of how territorial rulers were able to out compete or over compete their rivals.

These solutions may offer step-by-step problem-solving explanations or good writing examples that include modern styles of formatting and construction of bibliographies out of text citations and references. Students may use these solutions for personal skill-building and practice. Unethical use is strictly forbidden.

Explain the Sovereign Paradox
Introduction
The sovereign paradox in Europe has increasingly become an interesting topic within the political science realm. Even though scholars and researchers have attempted to elucidate the issue, they have done so in a less fulfilling manner. Indeed, they have only succeeded in creating further confusion as opposed to enlightenment about this subject. This is a pertinent gap that needs to be filled, going into the future. Therefore,this paper seeks to expound on the facets of the problem. Hence, the report will provide the definition of the issue, define the processes that gave rise to it, and which has continued to its sustenance, and the strategies that territorial rulers use to facilitate sovereign paradox. This study addresses one aspect of the sovereignty paradox, which is power maximization by territorial rulers.
Defining Sovereign Paradox
To understand the sovereign paradox, it is relevant to break the problem down to its basic parts, that is, sovereignty and paradox. According to Week 1, Lecture 2 (Wed 01/08/20), the term sovereignty denotes power, particularly monopoly power. Paradox, on its part, is surrender, which primarily means giving up. If this is the case, then the sovereignty paradox reflects the institutional changes that took place in Europe from the 1500s. The paradox is not a question of “why.” Instead, it is a question of how these changes occurred. The paradox addresses how power shifted from a state of being shared (between territorial ruler and institutions) to being placed in the hands of the territorial rulers, which manifests monopoly power. The shared power model meant that territorial rulers, including kings, queens, and princesses of the 1500s Europe, did not have much authority to make their decisions work. However, since then, these rulers became overly powerful such that the work of every institution...